Deaths at Disney (and other Disney Accidents) by Mateo Cotom

63 deaths at Disney world

25 deaths at Disney land


Ride: America Sings (Disneyland)

Date: July 8th, 1974

Cause of Death: Crushing

Incident: Deborah Gail Stone, an 18-year-old employee working as a hostess, was standing in the wrong spot during a ride intermission, and the rotating wall came down, trapping and crushing her between the rotating and non-rotating wall.


Ride: Matterhorn (Disneyland)

Date: May 1964

Cause of Death: Fall from ride

Incident: A 15-year old’s ride companion unbuckled his seatbelt. When he stood up in the bobsled he fell. He died 3 days later from injuries. Disneyland’s 1st fatal accident.


Ride: Tomorrowland (Disneyland)

Date: March 7, 1981

Cause of Death: Stabbing

Lawsuit: Disney settled for $600,000 because they didn’t ask for medical help faster.

Incident: An 18-year-old man was stabbed during a fight by a 28-year-old man after he pinched his girlfriend. His family sued the park for $60 million


Ride: Grand Floridian Resort & Spa (Disneyworld)

Date: June 14, 2016

Cause of Death: Alligator attack and drowning

Lawsuit: No public lawsuit.

Incident: A 2-year-old boy was attacked by an alligator on the shore of the Seven Seas Lagoon at 9:15pm before he went missing. His body was found the next afternoon under 6 feet of water.


Ride: Fantasmic fire-breathing dragon named Murphy?

Date: April 22nd, 2023

Incident: Murphy, the fire-breathing dragon caught on fire, and was never seen again.


Ride: performance of Aladin

Incident: Jasmine broke her neck


Ride: Disney Japan

Incident: person in costume had a seizure and heat stroke during a parde in Japan.


Ride: Disney’s Fort Wilderness Resort

Date: August 22, 1980

Cause of Death: Amoebic Meningoencephalitis

Lawsuit: None; this bacteria can live in any warm water

Incident: At the River Country water park, an eleven-year-old boy died after swimming in the water. The amoeba went up his nose and into his brain.


Ride: Roger Rabbit’s Car Toon Spin (Disney land)

Date: October 22, 2000

Cause of Death: Ran over and dragged by ride

Lawsuit: Disney settled for an undisclosed amount, but never admitted fault

Incident: 4-year-old Brandon Zucker was in a seat too close to the opening of the car with a malfunctioning lap bar and was dragged underneath the ride vehicle after falling out. He was folded in half and stuck for 10 minutes. Emergency help was called 5 minutes later. About 2 weeks before this incident, a new rule was established where ride operators had to call 911 first instead of Disney’s security center.

Afterwards, he wasn’t able to talk or walk. Because he never fully recovered from the brain damage, internal injuries, and cardiac arrest, he died at 13.


Date: March 2010

Lawsuit: Disney settled for $50k because his family said Disney didn’t “regulate and monitor the temperature of the nacho cheese which was being served to young children.”

Incident: 4-year-old Isaiah Harris tried to cling onto a food tray that had a cup of nacho cheese on it to keep himself from falling after sitting on an unstable chair. The food tray fell, and the nacho cheese spilled on his lap, face, and neck, which left severe burns.


Location: Magic Kingdom

Date: November 4, 1974

Cause of Death: Explosion

Incident: While a 49-year-old carpenter was working on the inside of a 66-foot aluminum boat, an explosion caused from the glue he was using killed him. Another carpenter was injured. The glue fumes ignited by the filament (a wire forming part of an electric bulb) could’ve caused the explosion.


Location: Epcot

Date: September 12, 1992

Cause of Death: Suicide

Incident: After Epcot closed, a 37-year-old man pointed a shotgun at 3 security guards and demanded to see his ex-girlfriend who worked there. He held 2 guards hostage in a restroom. When the police arrived, he released the guards and shot himself in the head. This was probably due to a recent breakup with his long-term girlfriend.

Why LEGO Disney Succeeds by Anakaren Aviles

It would seem from the get-go that Disney and LEGO were always compatible with each other. Both companies, to a degree, wanted to be geared towards children. Ole Kirk Kristiansen, LEGO’s founder, wanted to be strictly child-friendly, with no guns or violence in their inventory, believing in, “Only the best is good enough”. Walt Disney’s goal was to provide quality entertainment, and eventually, make an amusement park that the entire family could enjoy. Disney’s motto is, “Where dreams come true.” Disney allows its audience to indulge in their childhood, or grow up into adults that can still enjoy the ‘magic’. While Kristiansen once had a vision of a sanitized company, it would be his own grandson that would override the decision and make the jump to licensed toys.

This decision opened new doors for LEGO. Star Wars sets could be seen in production in 1999. Lucasfilms saved LEGO, who was going through it in the 90s. Furthermore, this company-saving decision proved something else: LEGO and Disney had similar interests. LEGO finally proved that they were a company that was willing to do themes and create licensed products. Prior to the 90s, LEGO emphasized their own ideas and toys, simply because they literally didn’t have the rights to franchises like Batman or Harry Potter. This decision was the hookup LEGO needed; not only did they demonstrate an eagerness to work with other brands, they already had a connection with Disney (which would be realized when Disney bought Lucasfilsm in 2012).

An important value for both these companies is high quality. It could be that their generally child-friendly approach to business made their relationship blossom, but the timing of each company’s success was very crucial. In 1999, Disney was profiting from Winnie the Pooh, so it would make sense for Disney to venture into LEGO with a safe IP to experiment with. Mickey Mouse sets were also created during this time, and these sets were released under the DUPLO line, which is geared towards children. It’s safe to say that these sets were likely a success, because it is hard to imagine either company would want to continue supporting a failing company line. Adding to the list of achievements, the first LEGO store in Disney also proved to be very successful. With all these experimental gambles being so profitable, it’s no wonder that these companies would tie the knot in 2009.

2009 was three years after Disney gained Pixar. Obviously, this means they’re going to go ham. Set after set. They ravaged Toy Story first, and the sets only continue to go up in price. The first LEGO Ideas Disney Pixar set would be released, as well as the first Disney princess set. I received this info from the LEGO website. Another important thing to note is that LEGO’s quality is a huge standard that the company is expected to deliver on by fans. LEGO is a very meticulous company that continues being one of, and in some years, the best reputable company. Riding the high of these successes, the current LEGO CEO expresses his interest of being more like Disney in terms of parks, entertainment, and shows/movies.

These impressive accomplishments would attract Disney enough to possibly celebrate their important upcoming anniversary with them. With LEGO expressing admiration for Disney’s success, Disney made the decision to celebrate their 100-year anniversary with LEGO. With Disney churning out movies and shows, and LEGO providing the physical memorabilia and toys, this match proves itself to be a very effective consumer circle. Almost every new Disney movie is followed by a new LEGO set. Many fans’ interests overlap these two companies together, and so long as there’s a demand from these top entertainment and toy companies, LEGO and Disney are likely to stay together.

Final Project:

This presentation got me thinking. LEGO is talking big, and it’s good to be ambitious, but I also wonder what they would look like if their goals were fully realized. My final project will be about what LEGO would look like if they did successfully become their own version of Disney.

Discussion Questions:

  1. Which Disney franchise should LEGO avoid?
  2. Do you think Disney would try to buy LEGO in the future?

“The Companion” Write Up by Excalibur Henry

“The Companion” from The Thirteen Problems by Agatha Christie (1932)

1.) What happened? and the Acute/Chronic Tension.

At a dinner party hosted by Arthur and Dolly Bantry, everyone takes turns sharing mysterious stories. Dr. Lloyd, St Mary Mead’s resident doctor, tells a story about Grand Canary, in Las Palmas. While staying at the Metropole Hotel in January, he watches a beautiful woman dance, and remarks that things are bound to happen to or because of her, and then looks at two Englishwomen, Miss Barton and Miss Durrant,  and says that they were the opposite — that life would pass them by and that they would live very boring existences, as most well-bred Englishwomen do. However, the story is in fact not about the beautiful woman, and really does turn out to be about the two boring Englishwomen.

The Englishwomen went out for a bath in the bay, and Ms. Durrant ended up drowning. Ms. Barton dove in after her, but was unsuccessful and would’ve drowned as well if a man didn’t row out to save her. Dr. Lloyd tried to save Ms. Durrant, but to no avail. He then reflects on a story a random woman told, about how Ms. Barton deliberately held Ms. Durrant’s head underwater. He doesn’t think much of it until much later.

Following her death, Dr. Lloyd and Ms. Barton do their best to find anything about Ms. Durrant’s life, with little luck. The one address that they did find was of her room, and the landlady of the building knew nothing about. They learn a lot of strange stories, but they all just point towards Ms. Durrant being a lonely old lady trying to finish out her retirement.

However, Dr. Lloyd begins to think back to when he first arrived at that beach to try and save Ms. Durant. Ms. Barton had looked back towards the ocean with clear, unmistakable anxiety written all over her face.  At the time of death, Dr. Lloyd had just written it off as distress about the death of her dear friend, but through searching for clues about her past, he came to realize that the two were not very  close, if they even were at all. He begins to conjure up wild, outlandish stories in his mind. 

He’d been ashamed to think that way about such a sweet, regular old lady. Even though he tried to be kind to Ms. Barton, a part of him knew that she was aware of his slight contempt for her. So Ms. Barton leaves early, because the shock upset her so much. Before she left, she thanked Dr. Lloyd, and asked if it was ever justified for someone to take the law into their own hands. After a brief, tense conversation, Ms. Barton asks if he has anything that could help her sleep since she hadn’t been sleeping well since the drowning.

By late March, Ms. Barton had been staying in a hotel in Cornwall. At night, she would pace her room while talking to herself. She decides to call the vicar and tell her about some crime that she committed, but she decides not to go through with it. She then goes missing, and leaves behind a letter that states that she’s going to join Miss Durant, because she wanted her forgiveness. She “died” the exact same way, by joining the deep sea.

Back at the dinner party, everyone begins to think of why she did what she did. Miss Marple draws the conclusion that Ms. Barton actually wasn’t Ms. Barton at all — she had been Ms. Durant the entire time, and instead drowned the real Ms. Barton in order to steal her identity. No one really knew the difference between them before the death, so who would be able to tell after that she was lying, especially because there were no existing relatives to deny it. This draws more attention to the odd circumstances of her presumed death … the body hadn’t ever been found. She just disappeared.

Dr. Lloyd confirms this, and admits that he had met the woman months later. She dies six months after their meeting.

The chronic tension is the reasons why Ms. Barton was drowned, and the acute tension is the drowning itself, and the way “Ms. Barton” handled it.

2.) What makes the story compelling/interesting?

The voice in the piece is so strong! I genuinely had no idea where the piece was going, and the big conclusion was really surprising to me! We care because from the very beginning there were little inconsistencies, they tell you the story is going to be about one person and it’s actually about another, they leave these little breadcrumbs around that you wouldn’t really look into that are actually SO important by the end, the entire story is a bunch of random tidbits that somehow fit together. It’s really suspenseful and is told as if we were sitting at that dinner party as well.

Christe utilizes imagery to keep everything dark yet still so clear. We watch/read the story unfold through a hyperspecific lens, one that the descriptions keep

The characterization is also really well done! I loved how both of the old ladies don’t have super/overly developed personalities, because at their core they were both the standard refined Englishwomen. We get so much from so little, it’s great.

There’s also a ton of foreshadowing, like when Dr. Lloyd thought the woman was just gaining weight, and the dead ends of Ms. Durant’s past. Foreshadowing in seemingly pointless ways defines the plot in a really fun way. I read it twice and everything made so much more sense the second time, everything was there, but as the reader you just don’t catch it.

3.) What I’d use/imitate in my own writing.

From this, I kind of got a sense of how much information should be revealed at once. As a writer it’s really tempting to give a bunch of information at once, or little to none at all, when there’s really supposed to be breadcrumbs sprinkled throughout the piece as a whole. At the same time, there’s really not a lot of information that doesn’t need to be there, it really feels like everything is there for some kind of narrative reason. And even though we’re given so much information, we don’t actually get to find out much about the WHY, because of the way the story was told (from that specific lens earlier).

4.) The Writing Exercise

Write a story from a one-sided lens, with all information about certain characters hidden. You can create the characters, but do not develop them beyond what they appear like to others, they should simply appear as vessels that plotpoints happen to rather than the people experiencing them.

5.) Discussion Questions!

  1. If the location had been swapped out for someplace else (like another island), do you think the plot would’ve been any different?
  2. Do you think Dr. Lloyd keeping silent about the truth for so long was justified? What would you have done if you were in his place? What dictates if someone is right or good, if not the law?
  3. Do you think having a seemingly unsatisfying conclusion for Ms. Barton was good, even though we don’t get to find out too much about why she did what she did? Would you have preferred more, or less details there, and why? Do you think she was a flat, or complex character?

Is the Frozen Franchise Really Worth Melting For? by Grace Duncan

Frozen!

It needs no introduction, but I’m going to give one to you anyway. Frozen’s concept rests upon a very loose retelling of the Snow Queen by Hans Christian Andersen, but the franchise’s crux is that it follows the relationship of two royal sisters in – one with questionably controllable ice powers, Elsa, and one without, Anna. The plot of the first film rests upon Elsa losing control of her powers (triggered by her emotions), which results in Anna and a cast of other characters, like the animated snowman Olaf, down on his luck ice-picker Kristoff, his reindeer Sven, and twist-villain Hans taking it upon themselves to end the sudden winter that envelops the kingdom of Arendelle results from Elsa’s little oopsie.

The result: a box-office smash hit which is still the third highest grossing animated film in history (only to be outdone by the Mario Bros movie and of course, Frozen 2 in the number slot). It seems like a pretty basic premise, but almost ten years after the release of the first film, it’s still a certified cultural phenomenon. The soundtrack album was #1 in the Billboard charts, surpassing Beyonce’s surprise album in 2013, won several industry accolades, some woman divorced her husband for his Frozen ambivalence – it is actually Frozen Fever.  Several theories have been posited for this craze, but still, no one can truly answer the question of why Frozen is so beloved – or hated – in current pop culture. In this presentation, I shall be analyzing the elements that made the Frozen franchise so ridiculously popular -if it really has any at all.

The First Film

Frozen was released on November 27, 2013. This release date is especially notable because it was released around the Thanksgiving holiday (leading up to Christmas) which is obviously strategic because it was The marketing, in terms of the trailers,  initially was just shorts of Olaf…

…as well as shots of action and adventure, which painted the movie as having “boy humor”. Then, as the release date approached, the creators actually revealed the entire plot, ice powers, sisters, Arendelle and all. This “pull back and reveal” techinque was very intriguing to viewers, as they got to see glimpses of the actual story. (Including me, who first saw the trailer in commercial breaks for My Little Pony and was enamored.)

Once Frozen was in theaters, it was everywhere: on merchandise, posters, and represented by seven-year olds in blond wigs and ice dresses running amuck. Frozen made DIsney 5.3 billion dollars in revenue – the sixth highest movie/franchise to ever make so much. And although Frozen’s target audience was little girls (me), it resonated with all ages because it twisted classic fairytale tropes and made it into something most considered new.

Frozen’s main boast is that the story centers around two sisters as opposed to a purely romantic relationship. As we saw, the gesture of true love was performed by Elsa, as opposed to Hans, who betrayed her in the end, or Kristoff, who realized he loved Anna in even less time than it took for Hans to propose. And the villain isn’t the woman with feared ice powers, it’s the dashing prince with sideburns who Anna wanted to marry the second they met.

Many of the elements that made the first Frozen unique are prevalent in many other Disney films. For example, Frozen’s signature sister-sister dynamic was also prevalent in Lilo and Stitch (2001), the themes of isolation were also dominant in Rapunzel (2010) and magic has been a staple of the fairytale genre since it was a thing (although it was presented in a less villainous light in Frozen). Much of the groundwork for Frozen was already laid previously, but all Disney’s “magical” staples just happened to be smashed together in this franchise.

Frozen gets a lot of the credit for reinventing the genre – one of the causes of the “Frozen Fever” – where it’s not really deserved. But – there’s one character that really cemented the Frozen craze…

The Character of Elsa and Let It Go

Look me in the eye and tell me you never wanted to be Elsa. See how you didn’t say anything? She’s got the dress, the powers, the ice castle, and delivered the Oscar-winning Let It Go.  She is one of the more interesting characters in the franchise, considering her complicated relation ship her sister, and her traumatic experiences with her powers. Many, many group were able to identify with her  plight of not fitting in and being ostracized throughout society, and she was very repressed and Let It Go was just as huge as Frozen itself, and is seen as an anthem for acceptance, rebellion, and freeing yourself from the past. Her character, as stated in the Guardian, contributed greatly to Frozen’s success – and by consequence, the Frozen Fever.

…. if there was one character who could be credited with sole responsibility for Frozen’s success, it’s her.

The complex, damaged older sister with icy powers that her abusive parents forced her to conceal, was originally the villain of the piece – blue of skin and spiky of hair. But when married songwriting duo Robert Lopez and Kristen Anderson-Lopez composed Let it Go as an empowering ode to self-acceptance, the film was rewritten and Elsa-mania was born. Voiced by Idina Menzel, she’s undoubtedly the darling of the film’s younger viewers; the combination of her powers and how she reacts to them enchants the target audience. But her anthem – which Anderson-Lopez says should encourage people to “screw fear and shame, be yourself, be powerful” – became a touchstone for a huge cross-section of adults, too. People feeling ostracised by society; cancer survivors; divorcees – messages of thanks flooded into the film’s creators.

Lucinda Everett for the Guardian 2014

Flaws in Elsa’s Character

Look, I adore Elsa just as much as the next girl, but her characterization has a few kinks. Although “Let It Go” is seen as an empowering anthem with a message of “screw society, embrace yourself”, Elsa was effectively running away from her problems in that scene, and thought isolating herself in an ice palace was the solution to the eternal winter she’d created. Elsa wasn’t her best mental state, either, considering the stress of her coronation, reuniting with her sister, and her trauma of trying to hide her powers since she was a young child. She wants to protect Anna, but puts her in harm’s way more often than not, and she never realizes the error of her ways and goes back to Arendelle on her own – she had to be captured by Hans and his soldiers. However, I doubt Disney thought about this, as Elsa was in effect that girl regardless and was making them money.

In my opinion, Anna is the better written character of the two, but she wasn’t as profitable as Elsa (not that it really made a difference). Elsa was part of the magic that made Frozen, and critical to Disney making all that cash. Many of these flaws went unnoticed by viewers (sort of), and the Frozen fever commenced all the way to…


The Sequel – Frozen 2 (2019)

Frozen 2 was released in the United States on November 22, 2019, which is practically the same week the first film was released (very strategic on Disney’s part). Disney brewed up a marketing storm for this one, with cryptic posters, cast Q and As, spamming it on social media, beautiful trailers, and much, much more. Evidently, it worked –  to this day Frozen 2 remains the highest grossing animated film of all time.

The new movie had a completely different plot, choosing to focus on Elsa even greater, particularly on the origins of her powers. Set three years after the first film, Elsa, strangely discontent with her restored life in Arendelle,  keeps hearing a strange call, which ends up in the gang (Elsa, Anna, Kristoff, Sven, Olaf) ends up in an enchanted forest, with the native people, elements, and secrets about Arendelle’s past.

Frozen 2 more overtly tried to appeal to all ages – after all, the kids who were obsessed with the first film (me) had grown older, after all,  and they still needed new little kids to inflict with the Frozen Fever. The characters, Anna and Olaf especially, grapple with becoming older (Olaf has a whole song about it). This kind of subverts the Disney brand, because Disney profits off of imagination and nostalgia – things that are trademarks of childhood. The subversion also plays into Frozen’s individual brand, since it’s seen as remixing the Disney formula (one of the supposed aspects of why people love it so darn much).


Frozen 2 more overtly tried to appeal to all ages – after all, the kids who were obsessed with the first film (me) had grown older, after all, and they still needed new little kids to inflict with the Frozen Fever. The characters, Anna and Olaf especially, grapple with becoming older (Olaf has a whole song about it). This kind of subverts the Disney brand, because Disney profits off of imagination and nostalgia – things that are trademarks of childhood. The subversion also plays into Frozen’s individual brand, since it’s seen as remixing the Disney formula (one of the supposed aspects of why people love it so darn much).

Production

The production process of Frozen 2 was chronicled in a documentary series entitled “Into the Unknown: Making Frozen 2”, which was released on Disney+ in June 2020. Although I have not personally watched the series, many viewers were appalled at the working conditions that the animators and behind-the-scenes staff had to endure, working very long hours for six days a week. The staff (the animation team) often has to sleep to at work and operate on very limited rest in order to have the film ready by the release date. The directors kept running into hiccups with the song “Show Yourself” and kids not understanding what was going on in the film during test screenings. Overall, it’s clear that the people behind this had the best intentions for this story, but their stress and the fact that they were overworked certainly explains the inconsistencies of the film.

This, obviously, didn’t dampen the amount of income Disney got. The message of the documentary was intended to be one of triumph: “wow, they went through all that and Frozen 2 still was a flawless film!” when in actuality knowing the context puts a lot of things into perspective.

By now, Disney had realized that Elsa was the most profitable character this franchise had to offer, and although the creative team had a say, it’s not unreasonable to assume that Frozen 2 focused on her purely for financial gain. She was that girl times 2 in this movie – with the water horse, the incredibly detailed outfits (as a result of Disney’s advancing animation software), and gay subtext. However, many of the problems in her character still persist from the first film, and they’ve become even more convoluted due to the nature of the plot. She still runs away from her problems (and sister… and snowman, who are only trying to help her), is the fifth elemental spirit for some reason, and surrenders the throne to her sister to take up her true destiny in the enchanted forest. She puts people in danger more often than not, and none of this is actually addressed in the film, so it just kind of looks like she did bad things without receiving any real consequences.

However, her desire to go “into the unknown” and discover new things resonated with viewers, and was one of the better parts of the film. But overall, Frozen 2 would’ve made money regardless of its flaws because – well, it’s Frozen. Despite the thin plot, the songs that didn’t exactly have the same impact as the first film, the backtracking in characterization, the Frozen Fever still persisted. In the space between the first and second film (and after the second), Disney launched animated shorts, books, Frozen on Ice, and most importantly….

The Musical – Frozen on Broadway, 2018-2020

After a 2017  try-out run at the Buell Theatre in Denver, Colorado, Frozen premiered on Broadway in March 2018, produced by the one and only Disney Theatrical Group. Frozen’s musical adaptation is based upon the plot of the first film, but being that it’s a musical, it had to expand in terms of song number and run time. The show boasts 23 songs in total, including all the ones from the original film.  Although it was met with mixed reviews, Frozen stayed on Broadway until March 2020, when it was canceled due to the COVID-19 pandemic, and since it wasn’t money as much money as Aladdin or the Lion King, Disney made the executive decision to close the show’s Broadway run (although there are still international productions and productions on tours). 


The first priority [for Disney Theatrical] … is when you have a property that is as beloved and music-based as Frozen, that has to get an enormous amount of my attention. To say, ‘How do we take this and make a sophisticated, adult evening of theater out of it?’

— Tom Schumacher (president of Disney Theatrical Group) interview with Southern California Public Radio in November 2014

Unlike the sequel, Frozen’s creative team was actually given ample amount of time to make the musical production of quality, and it shows. Bob Iger himself declared: “We’re not demanding speed. We’re demanding excellence.” Development actually began in 2014 – meaning the creative time had years to string this adaptation together. Writing- wise, the musical improves upon the 2013 film in terms of characterization, fleshes out relationships (Anna’s particularly), and the technical aspects, like the sets, lighting, costumes, and special effects are simply stunning.

Although Frozen’s musical drew kids to the production, they weren’t this adaptations target audience like the first film’s. 70 percent of audiences were adults without children. And as the quote in the previous slide says, the content of the musical was scaled up to be more mature (for example, Elsa is shown to be having suicidal thoughts).

Frozen the musical made $150 million dollars on Broadway and drew audiences of 1.3 million. It was nowhere near as popular as the film: but, in my opinion, exceeds that film’s quality because it fixes (most) of the plot holes and enriches the characters.

Along with literally every major character in the story, Elsa’s character was greatly expanded upon and we learn a lot more about her and what informs her decisions. For example, in the troll (called “hidden folk” in the musical) scene after Elsa strikes Anna in the head, Grandpappie shows her a vision that her powers will end up killing everyone she loves, which makes her even more afraid of her powers and what she can do. Elsa sees herself as a monster unfit for society, and  that affects every aspect of her life. She’s unable to accept help from her sister in fear of hurting her. Overall, Elsa’s plight is a lot more understandable and shows her complexity that was laid down in the first movie, but not truly elaborated upon given the movie’s PG rating and run time to cater to the attention span of preschoolers.

So, is the Frozen franchise really worth melting for?

Frozen has many, many flaws, ones that are glaring (Hans)  and ones that go unnoticed, and the fact that it’s Disney’ darling that made it such a ludicrous amount of money. Frozen, in essence, is basically the compounding of the Disney brands, with a couple things remixed to make things interesting. But it’s a story that’s endured for almost a decade, and hasn’t gotten any less big. This is going to sound like Disney propaganda, but despite all the marketing genius and the atrocities inflicted upon the animators for Frozen 2, Frozen still means well. Although not as original as Disney claims it is, it rest upon a relationship of two sisters, a cool queen with ice powers, and other wacky snow antics that make it irresistible. Frozen shaped several childhoods and remains in our hearts today. It’s a sweet tale at its core – so hey, why not melt for it?

Discussion Questions

  1. Did you partake in the Frozen Fever? Do you think that it has  had the same or similar effect on Gen Z that the Disney Renaissance had on millennials?
  2. Do you think the character of Elsa is actually complex, or was she just a tool for Disney to earn even more revenue?  Do you relate to her? Do you think Elsa’s reliability allowed Disney to profit more off of her?

Project Idea

Write a  short memoir in which you chronicle the events of your life in relation to a Disney craze – in my case, Frozen Fever. Show how it has affected you as a person and try to include elements of the Disney craze in your own writing.

Disney’s Fantasia Is One Story Theory Explained by Chase Johnson

What is Fantasia?

A 1940 American animated musical anthology film, produced and released by Walt Disney Studios, with story direction by Joe Grant and Dick Huemer. The story consists of eight animated segments, set to pieces of classical music conducted by Leopold Stokowski, seven of which are performed by the Philadelphia Orchestra. Deems Taylor acts as the Master of Ceremonies, the host who gives context and a preface to each piece. 

Walt Disney intended for this film to highlight the symbiotic relationship between animation and music, specifically traditional classical music. At the time, animation was seen as juvenile, especially compared to classical music, which saw a resurgence in the mid 1930’s. Disney wanted to convey not only that animation is just as important as classical music, but they aid each other in their individual functions. He believed that a musical piece itself had a narrative arc which could dictate the animations plot, while the animation gives tangibility to the music. 

That’s why Deems Taylor as the Master of Ceremonies because, as a real-world music critic, he is the representative of all classical music and its famous composers, so if Deems Taylor is a part of the movies, in a meta way, it implies that the very pieces of music used to critique Disney’s art form, are on their side and cosign the project.

Quick Music Lesson: Absolute Music vs. Program Music

Absolute music is music that just exits as music and serves no other purpose. And program music is music that calls for some extra musical imagery or narrative.

Absolute music was “created” after the death of Beethoven, he and his works were heralded as “genius” by the music critics of time. They also viewed composers in the same vein as him to be equally as genius and proclaimed that their music should be the standard for quality music. At the same time, a composer rising in popularity named Johannes Brahms, he wished to be recognized as just as good as the now legendary composers. He built upon the foundation of classical music and is considered one of the faces of absolute music.

 With Wagner as it’s face, after hearing Beethoven last symphony, which was the first to add a choir, he believed that their was no way to elevate classic music any further. So he believed the only way to enhance the experience was to add a “structure” akin to story plot in the music and use another medium to convey this. 

How Does This Influence Fantasia?

That both perspectives were of equal value and used both methods to illustrate the aforementioned relationship between music and animation. Deems Taylor mentioned in the film that the pieces shown in the movie fall into three categories: Music for the sake music, Music that doesn’t have a specific narrative but creates an atmosphere, and music that tells a story.

What If Fantasia Was A Whole Story?

Now that the intent of the film has been clear, let us explore the possibility of the theory. Now Fantasia is by no means one story, it created as eight different shorts put together, but it would be interesting to see if a coherent, linear plot can be created from this movie. For this to work certain sequences and events from different shorts happen one after the other, so parts of different segments will be broken up and rearranged. To signify this change, “Part I”, “Part II”, to shorts that will be broken up.

Toccata & Fugue In D Minor

We start our story with the creation of the universe, abstract shapes and colors flash across the screen as the world takes form. 

Pastoral Symphony Part I:

The gods appear after the creation of the universe and the earth, Zeus the Greek God of Thunder and the Sky, and Vulcan the Roman God of Fire and Metalwork specifically, the two of them live in the clouds on Earth. Vulcan constructs Zeus’ lightning bolt, which Zeus throws at the ocean and the dinosaurs are created.

The Rite of Spring

When the lightning bolt struck the ocean, a single organism was created and from there all the dinosaurs branch from that organism. They savagely fight each other until the sun becomes so hot until they go extinct.

Nutcracker Suite

The gods realize they made a mistake with the dinosaurs by making them vicious, recreating the world with magic and wonder.

Discussion Questions

  1. Do you think that the “shared universe” attitude of the current Disney brand and its subsidiaries is contradictory to the old Disney themes of individualism?
  2. Is it ok for fans to re work the intent for the art to serve their fandom wants?

Idea for Project

Make a complete story out of Fantasia 2000?

Disney, Masculinity, and My Dad by Lila Mankad

Introduction

When I told my dad that I was going to take a Disney class, he was horrified. “Why?” he asked, disgust tinging his voice. “What are your other options?”

I ignored his comments and took the class anyways. When I told Ms. Rolater that he was a “Disney Hater,” she told me to ask him why. His answer surprised me. He said, “It shaped my idea of masculinity in ways I can’t undo.” There was something about his response that hinted at a deeper resentment.

Masculinity and Disney

Many are aware of the effect of Disney on girls– the classic Disney Princess Effect– but what message are the boys getting? 

Before we address this question, it is first important to understand what masculinity is. The National Democratic Institute defines masculinity as the “social expectations of being a man.”

So, what are the social expectations of being a Disney man? In many Disney movies, especially the older ones, princesses are damsels in distress. For example, Snow White must be kissed by Prince Charming in order to be saved. Prince Eric kills Ursula, saving Ariel. On the flip side, this sets the expectation of masculinity that in order to get the Disney Princess, men must swoop in and take charge. In addition, there are often certain kinds of men portrayed in Disney. According to a thesis analyzing men in 22 Disney animated movies from 1930 to 2007, most central male characters were white, heterosexual, slender and fit, and likely to engage in hand to hand fighting (Hibbeler). 

This reinforces the idea of more aggressive, boys-will-be-boys, types of male performances. In several studies, boys have been shown to be more likely to be physically aggressive than girls. While it is unfair to pin this solely on Disney, it is true that Disney is contributing to these social expectations, and thus, the idea of aggression as integral to masculinity.

However, not all Disney men are so traditionally masculine. There is a long history of queer-coded men, especially villains. While the study cited above mostly brushes past this, it does say that “evil characters [are] more likely to be well dressed.” This is linked to the Hays Code, when openly gay characters were not allowed on screen, but queer-coded characters could be shown only if they were portrayed in a negative light, and were punished at the end of the movie. This code led to a long tradition of queer-coded villains that continues into more modern Disney. 

However, there was also a level of subversive messaging going on. Howard Ashman, a gay man, was responsible for the lyrics of many queer coded men in the films, notedly in Beauty and the Beast and the Little Mermaid. However, many of the young boys watching Disney can miss this messaging. Instead, they see that a softer form of masculinity is villainous.

Raj Mankad, Disney, and Masculinity

I sat down across the kitchen table, set my recorder, and we began to talk. 

My father started off by expressing his resentment that he is like “a fish in water.” He went on to clarify:

“I’m the fish, and there’s this giant cultural milieu that I exist in that I can’t control, and Disney is like one of the dominant forces that I don’t have any control over.”

He feels like Disney is a major force on his life, and his perception of himself, but he had no choice in choosing that influence. Disney is so pervasive in society, that it by default forms people’s ideas of their own masculinity. He goes on to further categorize this resentment:

“It’s kind of like when you resent your own religion, or you resent your mother, or something like that.”

This was a surprising statement to me. I didn’t know he held such tenderness towards Disney, but he described childhood memories of watching TV, going to Disney world, and imagining with Disney characters. The same aspects of Disney that provide warm childhood memories are the ones that form a child’s societal expectations, creating a complex, hard to interpret mix of emotions.

He goes on to describe the ways he consumed Disney. Whenever a family member from India would visit his hometown of Mobile, Alabama, they would all drive 8 hours to visit Disney World. In addition, he watched a lot of Scrooge McDuck after school as a young child. When he was in middle and high school, the Disney Renaissance occurred, further impacting his mental development in these formative years. Disney, he says, “was a big part of my identity.”

He also describes positive associations with the movie Aladin, which he said had “way more positive… representation[s] of South Asian adjacent people than anything else while I was a kid that was mainstream.” This shows the power Disney held, both nationally and in my dad’s Alabama hometown. Representation, even if imperfect, was important. 

However, as he grew older, and became more of “somebody who’s thinking and trying to figure out [his] own gender and sexuality,” he became more aware of the impact Disney had on his ideas of masculinity.

“[I realized that] the Disney movies are such a dominant force that you don’t even realize how much it shapes you, and so you can’t even undo it. It’s hard, even once you figure out what it’s doing and what it did, you think you can deconstruct it intellectually, but you can’t. 

It’s always there, the person you were raised as not just by your parents, but by the culture or the culture around you. You can’t totally undo it.”

This shows the life long effects growing up in a Disney saturated culture can have. Once it affects your development, as he describes, it is nearly impossible to completely remove from your ideas of social expectation, morality, and masculinity. In his eyes, Disney has permanently shaped who he is, and the lack of choice is upsetting.

It’s important to note that the other cultural influences my father was receiving from Mobile, Alabama, likely influenced his development as well. He describes the culture as full of “super toxic white masculinity… wrapped up in white supremacy.” As such, Disney cannot be fully blamed, but it didn’t serve to truly break the narrative he was receiving of what it could mean to be a man.

When asked how Disney affected his idea of masculinity, my father found it difficult to respond. Eventually, he said it was defined by “violence and physical domination,” traits very uncharacteristic of my father. He had more to say about women’s depictions, though. He describes them as “hyper feminine,” with a move towards more agency in the 90s to 2000s, but with “a limit to how much could change.”

“There was always a limit to how much could change. For black and brown people and nonstandard males and females or non standard gender and sexuality, there was a limit to how much they could be represented.”

We went on to discuss queer coding in Disney, which he knows exists, but says he totally missed as a child. He didn’t get the subtext, only the negative “text.” It took him until college to truly start considering what kind of person and what kind of man he wanted to be.

“The thing is, the reason it’s liberating to think about queer people, even if you’re not queer queer, is that there are so many different ways to be, say, cis.”

This is the message he needed, but did not get from Disney.

Raj Mankad, Disney, and Family Expectations

 As I dug deeper into the interview, I discovered that Disney also held strong, emotional connections to the expectations of his family. As some background, my father’s entire family are doctors. He went through college and one year of medical school, before quitting and becoming a writer. This event is probably one of the most impactful, painful, and powerful moments of his life, and Disney is connected to it.

“I guess the one of the things about Disney is that since I went to Disney World with my family, and I got upset with my family eventually about how limited I thought their conception of what life should be like and what I should do with my life, that all got wrapped up with Disney too. 

I just felt like Disney was like this hyperreal where you spend all this money and time and you go to Disney World, and then you end up in these fake versions of urban life that are cleansed of all the complicated things, and more interesting, more beautiful things. 

This displays a fundamentally different view on life than the rest of my father’s family. It’s also a fundamentally anti-Disney view. He says that Disney is like “paying to have your… view of life and what you should do with it set up in a super constrained consumeristic way,” which mirrors the way he believes his family wants him to live. In actuality, his life is completely opposite of these Disneyized expectations. He is an opinion editor, and there is nothing he loves more than finding the urban life of Houston full of “complicated things.” He describes all the choices in his life that go against these Disney/family expectations: not becoming a doctor, marrying my mom, vacationing in Mexico city. All of these major decisions and values that define his life are also intrinsically related to Disney. Even if they seem to oppose the Disney ideas, the whole framing of life and values that he is resisting is shaped by Disney. I can see why he’s resentful: he really can’t escape.

Finally, we moved onto the topic of our family trip to Disney World that we took around 10 years ago. He describes being badgered by his family into taking a family trip: 

“I told them I didn’t want to go and I didn’t want the family to do it, but I love them, and I cared about them. And they insisted. So I said “I will go, but I won’t go on the trip and spend time with everybody because everybody will be there.” I just absolutely will not go to Disney World.”

Instead of coming to Disney World with us, he studied alone in the hotel room for his comprehensive exams for his pHD. 

I thought that was the end of the story– my father hates Disney because it permanently impacted his ideas of gender and sexuality, as well as his values and goals in life, in ways that he cannot change. 

However, my grandparents, his parents, unexpectedly popped into the house. I asked if I could interview them, and their contributions added unexpected depth.

Firstly, they confirmed the extreme level of Disney messaging my father was getting, and their disinterest in questioning it. They told me that when my father was very young, around 2 years old, he loved Disney. They took him to Disney when he was very young, and when he was a few years older, he had forgotten that he had gone and insisted on going again. At one point, they said, “Who doesn’t want to go to Disney?” Apparently, my dad and his brother visited three times in one year.

They also expanded upon their tradition of taking guests from India to Disney World. My Dadi explained how she would pack a trunk full of Indian food so they could eat familiar food while experiencing the Disney magic. This layered, multicultural experience is quintessential of the immigrant American experience.

When they explained this, I realized something. My grandparents see Disney as the epitome of American culture, in a way to aspire to. When my grandmother was pregnant with my uncle, they visited Disney World, back when it was a newly opened park in a hotel-less town called Orlando. Disney World was literally one of their first impressions of the US, and as immigrants, that shaped how they lived their life. It represented their American Dream.

My dad also sees Disney as the epitome of American culture, but in a terrible, sinister way that was harmful to him growing up. He sees expectations to follow along the same path as his parents, the pressure to follow money, and the suffocating societal norms he suffered in Mobile, Alabama. It represents his American Nightmare.

Disney is symbolic of their entire relationship, both to America and each other. 

Interview 1: Lila Mankad and Raj Mankad

Lila Mankad  

Hello, please state your name and who you are.

Raj Mankad  

My name is Raj Mankad. I am the child of Vipul and Aparna Mankad, the husband of Miah Arnold and the father of Lila and Vishwa Mankad.

Lila Mankad  

All right, excellent introduction. I’m Lila Mankad, your interviewer today, and I’m here to ask you about Disney. So, would you classify yourself as not a fan of Disney, an anti-Disney person, or a Disney hater…?

Raj Mankad  

It reminds me of when people ask me if I’m Hindu. My short answer is that I think it’s a little bit like being a fish in water. Like the fish doesn’t even know it’s in the water. I mean, I know that I’m in the water. But I guess I have some resentment because I feel like a fish in water. And I don’t really have a choice about it. 

Lila Mankad  

You’re the fish and Disney is the water? 

Raj Mankad  

Yeah, I’m the fish, and there’s this giant cultural milieu that I exist in that I can’t control, and Disney is like one of the dominant forces that I don’t have any control over. 

So I guess I have some resentment. But it’s kind of like when you resent your own religion, or you resent your mother, or something like that. I have very dear memories with Disney. I can remember seeing movies, I can remember jokes, or being with people when I was watching the movies. I also grew up in Mobile, Alabama, which is within driving distance of Disney World. And anytime anybody visited from India, to Mobile, which was basically every year, sometimes twice, we would drive the 8 hours from Mobile to Orlando, and go to Disney World. 

Lila Mankad  

Wow, I didn’t realize Mobile was so close.

Raj Mankad  

Yeah, so it was like a big part of my identity. Because of the movies of course. But also there were a lot of Disney cartoons that were playing on TV when I was growing up, and unlike now, there wasn’t an infinite sort of Borgesian level of access to any kind of culture that I wanted or got directed to by an algorithm. There was just one thing that was on TV, there was one channel that had cartoons. And it had Disney cartoons on it, like old Mickey Mouse stuff, old Donald Duck stuff. 

But also this new thing at the time with Scrooge McDuck, which I watched for years, and it had a big place in my imagination. Then when I was in middle school and high school, there was this big new wave of Disney movies, when it kind of came back to life and they shed their old way of doing things. People started watching Disney cartoons in a big way again. 

Lila Mankad  

The Disney revolution.

Raj Mankad  

Is that’s what it’s called? Yeah, so like, what is the one with Prince Ali? Aladdin was a big deal. The Little Mermaid was a really big deal. 

Aladdin was also a really big deal because it had brown people in it, who kind of looked like me and my friends. I know it has a bunch of stereotypes and things but it was way more positive than any representation of South Asian adjacent people than anything else while I was a kid that was mainstream. So that was good. 

But as I got older, I became more of an intellectual, and more of an adult, and more of somebody who’s thinking and trying to figure out my own gender and sexuality. [I realized that] the Disney movies are such a dominant force that you don’t even realize how much it shapes you, and so you can’t even undo it. It’s hard, even once you figure out what it’s doing and what it did, you think you can deconstruct it intellectually, but you can’t. 

It’s always there, the person you were raised as not just by your parents, but by the culture or the culture around you. You can’t totally undo it.

And since I grew up in Mobile, Alabama, in this super toxic white masculinity that was wrapped up in white supremacy, at the same time, I was surrounded by all this Disney stuff, so it’s all sort of a giant jumble to me.

Lila Mankad  

Could you describe further in what ways Disney shaped your idea of gender and sexuality?

Raj Mankad  

Yeah. The relationships, at least outwardly and to my knowledge, were all heterosexual. The masculinity was generally physical. I mean, there’s a certain level of cleverness that some of the male characters have but it’s….. hmm. 

I liked Prince Ali actually. There’s Little Mermaid, there’s not even very many men in it. There’s the prince who’s like a non-character.

Lila Mankad  

Yeah, he technically comes in at the end and kills Ursula.

Raj Mankad  

Oh, right. But basically there’s a lot of violence and physical domination.  What were the other ones that came out? In the 90s and the 80s? 

Lila Mankad  

Lion King.

Raj Mankad  

Oh yeah. Lion King. 

Lila Mankad  

Lion King’s got some interesting stuff going on. There’s Simba who you see grow up. And in that one, it’s like the status quo wins.

Raj Mankad  

Right.

Lila Mankad  

I mean, I was rewatching some of [Lion King] for this project. Scar is just ridiculed. There’s one scene where Mufasa’s advisor says “There’s one of those in every family..” 

Raj Mankad  

And he might be queer. 

But then the female characters are hyper feminine. They have really long hair and really narrow waists. They are a little bit assertive, so like, there was some rethinking of agency. But I think what happened in the 90s to the early 2000s, was that there was always a limit to how much could change. For black and brown people and nonstandard males and females or non standard gender and sexuality, there was a limit to how much they could be represented. 

I have to say I still think that Aladdin did a pretty good job in terms of agency. But they’re pretty tried and true, standard representations of gender and sexuality.

Lila Mankad  

Aladdin’s also got some interesting things going on with them, with Jafar and the genie. We read an article about them, a queer reading. I mean, almost all Disney villains have a queer reading of them. That’s another thing. It’s like, all the non-standard performances of maleness are villains and sending subtext. 

Raj Mankad  

They could be counter read, at least they have a presence. Which maybe as a kid, I kind of detected and internalized but not really.

Lila Mankad  

So it’s like, that [messaging] was hitting some people but not really the boys [like you] growing up with it? 

Raj Mankad  

Yeah. I mean, I had a vague idea that I wanted to be accepting and tolerant of different kinds of people. But it wasn’t until college that I gave real thought to gender and sexuality. I had to change my assumptions in thinking. 

The thing is, the reason it’s liberating to think about queer people, even if you’re not queer queer, is that there are so many different ways to be, say, cis. Like that language of just cis and trans is just, is actually not nearly good enough. But at least it’s a step forward, it’s a step away from a binary. 

Lila Mankad  

Then there’s Beauty and the Beast.

Raj Mankad  

Yeah. For some reason, I didn’t really watch that.

Lila Mankad  

Beauty and the Beast has this hyper masculine representation with Gaston, who is the villain. Do you remember the song? It’s like, no one fights like Gaston, no one bites like Gaston! I mean, he’s kind of ridiculed for that level of hyper masculinity.

Raj Mankad  

Yeah.

Lila Mankad  

And there’s the beast.

Raj Mankad  

Yeah, who’s kind of allowed to be sensitive and vulnerable, but he’s still a gigantic beast.

Lila Mankad  

And then the climax of the movies is when the two men are fighting, and Belle is just watching, yelling “Noooo!” 

Raj Mankad  

I guess the one of the things about Disney is that since I went to Disney World with my family, and I got upset with my family eventually about how limited I thought their conception of what life should be like and what I should do with my life was like, that all got wrapped up with Disney too. 

I just felt like Disney was like this hyperreal where you spend all this money and time and you go to Disney World, and then you end up in these fake versions of urban life that are cleansed of all the complicated things, and more interesting, more beautiful things. And in all the time you’ve paid to go there, there’s all these product placements. So like, the Hall of Life is brought to you by Exxon or GM, or something like that. You’re spending all your money and time, basically paying to have your symbolic order and your view of life and what you should do with it set up in a super constrained consumeristic way. 

And that was all pointing towards this path of becoming a doctor, and marrying the kind of person that my parents wanted me to marry, and chasing money. All that, to me, is wrapped up in Disney. So like marrying somebody who isn’t like a Disney-like beauty– like your mom is really beautiful, but she’s not a Disney character “beautiful.” Or choosing to be a writer, instead of a physician and making a whole bunch of money. 

Or even if I have leisure time, going to an actual place with my family like Mexico City, where there’s real streets full of actual vendors and street life and street performers and indigenous people and artists and food stalls and it’s messy, and you get inconvenienced sometimes, and sometimes it’s dangerous. But weirdly, it’s like a lot cheaper and more fun than going to Disney World. All of that, to me is wrapped up in Disney. 

I don’t know if you remember but my parents insisted that my whole family all go to Disney World together. That we went and Mehul and Vaishali and them all went. I told them that I just absolutely was not going to go to Disney World. I told them I didn’t want to go and I didn’t want the family to do it, but I love them, and I cared about them. 

And they insisted. So I said “I will go, but I won’t go on the trip and spend time with everybody because everybody will be there.” I just absolutely will not go to Disney World. One of the reasons I was able to do that in a way that didn’t hurt everybody’s feelings is that I was in the middle of my comprehensive exams for my PhD. And so I was able to say, “Look, there’s no way I can do this. I have to spend all my time right now like reading this list of 80 books.” So it was pretty crazy. We all rented this condo house thing. You all went to Disney World and I just sat in a room by myself reading, that’s how much Disney bothers me.

Lila Mankad  

Were you bothered that Vishwa and I were going or not? 

Raj Mankad  

No, I mean, it’s like I said, you’re in the world and Disney is part of the world.

Lila Mankad  

Is there anything in there you don’t want me to share with Ms Rolater and the class?

Raj Mankad  

No. I mean, I think that the latest round of Disney movies like Frozen and all the other ones, it’s always kind of enervating at first and you feel like the world is changing. Because these norms are changing, and the Disney movies move the world’s norms in a certain direction. 

And basically, Ron DeSantis tried to take on Disney and they crushed him. Yeah, because people aren’t gonna give up like that allure and encompassing symbolic order that Disney World has created for them. It’s just so powerful. 

So like, I guess there’s a part of me that’s like, “yeah, Disney!” Like when you get confronted with how bad things can be, and then you realize how powerful a force Disney is to norm people into something that’s not that bad. Then you think like, “okay, Disney is good. I’m glad it’s around.” 

But then it’s sort of like NPR, I just get really, really mad and frustrated and upset that like this is as far as it goes. It takes the edge and real revolutionary potential out of the work that artists do for decades and then it smooths it over and robs it of its full potential.

Lila Mankad  

All right. Anything else?

Raj Mankad  

No.

Lila Mankad  

Okay, thank you so much. 

Interview 2: Lila Mankad, Raj Mankad, Vipul Mankad, Aparna Mankad

This interview includes Raj Mankad, previous interviewee, and his parents Vipul Mankad and Aparna Mankad. It functions like a family conversation, so there is some interrupting going on, especially from Vipul.

In addition, keep in mind that Vipul and Aparna are English as a Second Language speakers, so some of their language might be grammatically strange.

Mehul: Raj’s brother, Vipul and Aparna’s son.

Nehal: Raj and Mehul’s cousin.

Raj Mankad  

Can you tell the story about how I wanted to go to Disney?

Aparna Mankad  

When we visited Disney first time, Raj was like two year old. He enjoyed the teacup ride and Small, Small World and all the other kiddie rides. At the end of the day, he was so happy and fell asleep on his shoulder and we walked out of Disney. We thought, wow, Raj had a great time too. And then he grows a year or two later when he understands what is Disney. 

We told him we we did go to Disney, but he said, “But I don’t remember, we have to go again!” So then we went again, second trip for Raj. And I mean, of course Mehul was happy, who doesn’t want to go to Disney? So we went second time.

Vipul Mankad  

Almost every guest that would come to our home in Mobile, we would take them to Disney. So our parents, my sister, I think a couple other people. 

Aparna Mankad  

In those days, Disney pass was so affordable, I would say like $100 for a whole year. Annual pass. So that year we went two times. And then we had a meeting in Fort Lauderdale or somewhere– Daytona. So Raj and Mehul went by themselves to Disney.

Raj Mankad  

By the time Mehul and I went to third time that one year, we knew the layout of Disney World so well– which lines were long at what time of the day– that even though we just had like five hours, we nailed all our favorite rides. 

Aparna Mankad  

And then they were back.

Raj Mankad  

What about Disney movies? What do you remember about us watching Disney movies? 

Aparna Mankad  

Oh all the Disney movies on TV?

Raj Mankad  

Do you remember when Aladdin came out? 

Aparna Mankad  

Aladdin, and there were some other Disney movies too? Little Mermaid and some stories.

Raj Mankad  

Do you remember how I used to watch the Donald Duck and Scrooge McDuck after school?

Vipul Mankad  

Disney is not just Disney World, right? Because there is a whole Disney brand, like the Mickey Mouse hat. There’s one picture where you have it, Raj.

Raj Mankad  

Did I get that in Disney World? Wow.

Aparna Mankad  

I remember one other thing. When Mehul was young and we had to go back to India, I bought a Donald Duck toy for him. And Mehul loved that toy, and then– 

Vipul Mankad  

But one interesting thing is that when Mehul was not yet born, when Dadi was pregnant with Mehul, that’s the first time that we went to Disney World together.

Disney World had just opened. Orlando was just like this small village. I mean, there were no big hotels. We stayed in a bed and breakfast.

Aparna Mankad  

I have some picture of me pregnant with Mehul in Disney. They have a picture. 

But the Mehul’s Toy, The Donald Duck, made it to India, and he used to play with it. Then comes around Nehal, and we just had one. So Mehul had to share with Nehal and that was a very difficult thing. You can’t make two Donald Ducks out of one.

Vipul Mankad  

Alright, so now we have to plan a trip. Vishwa will be like Raj, he’ll say “What? What Disney?”

Raj Mankad  

Yeah. Yeah.

Transcribed by https://otter.ai

Interview 3- a brief note with Aparna Mankad

In this, Aparna is talking about her process when they would bring family from India to visit Disney World.

Aparna Mankad

They enjoyed Disney but they were not really used to American food, because they just arrived and then they are at the home so they get to eat Indian food. So both times, I packed trunks of Indian spices– dal, rice, pressure cooker, pappard, lots of chapati– and then we would rent a condominium like thing. Then, every morning I cook the Indian dinner for evening. 

And everybody would shower and eat the breakfast– fried rice and some Indian stuff. Then the lunch they could handle with ice cream and fries and things like that. But by evening, they were all ready for the real thing.

Discussion Questions

  1. Has Disney affected your idea of masculinity?
  2. Do you feel like it is possible to “undo” the norms Disney perpetuate?
  3. Is Disney improving in it’s portrayals of masculinity and/or femininity?

A Glimpse into Disney Adults by Camille Gonzales

(basically, an extensive rant) 

I want to start by making something clear here. There’s nothing wrong with Disney Adults and there’s nothing wrong with being a Disney Adult. Who cares what society thinks, anyway? I don’t have anything against Disney Adults. I mean, I, too, am a Disney Adult myself (happy belated birthday to me wooo). Don’t take the things I say here too seriously. It’s all said in good fun, and I’m poking fun at the stereotype that is “Disney Adult.”  

Secondly, I want to take a second to recognize the hard work that I put into the actual presentation itself! I’m not sure if it is visible to those of you reading this write-up, but I chose a very cute and colorful Slidesgo slide deck (shoutout Slidesgo. None of this would be possible without you <3) on theme with Disney. On the title of the presentation (the first slide), I dotted the ‘I’ in Disney with Mickey Ears. I tapped into my inner Disneyfication instincts there.  

Let’s talk about what a Disney Adult is. Well, we’ve all seen them one way or another. As defined by Urban Dictionary, a Disney Adult is—  

A millennial adult, with or without kids, that can’t stop talking about Disney, including the movies and the parks. Even if they do have kids, they’re still way more obsessed with it than their kids ever would be. They probably engage in casual ‘Disneybounding’ and visit the theme parks at least once a year. They are obsessed with everything Disney and probably have a Mickey Mouse bumper sticker and/or tattoo. One of the most terrifyingly intense people you’ll ever encounter.

—for those of you who have never encountered one. So yeah… they’re definitely something. And for those of you who are unfamiliar with the term “Disneybounding,” it is, to put it simply, an adult who wears everyday articles of clothing that, when worn together, resemble the outfit of a Disney character. This is often done when the Disney Adults are actively practicing their Disney-ness by going to the parks (Disney does not allow people 13 and older to dress up in Disney costumes) … but do not misunderstand. Do not underestimate the willpower of the Disney Adult. They will Disneybound just because.  

A Disney Adult Iceberg Tier List is showcasing the six levels of being a Disney Adult as designed by YouTuber Kurtis Conner (he is an excellent resource for learning about Disney Adults— more on that later). The tiers don’t have official names, they have photo cards which progressively get more unsettling as you descend the list. For the sake of the presentation and clarity, I assigned each of the tiers silly names.  

Just a few tweaks to the tier list: To tier one, I want to add Marvel fans and Star Wars fans, because these fans are well-liked and respected in society. It’s rather normal to take a liking to these Disney branches at any age. To tier five, I want to add Disney proposals. I just feel like proposals are on the same lines as weddings and anniversaries. Also, a brief note: Whether these Disney Adults have kids or not is irrelevant to this study. I will be referencing these tiers from this point forward, so make sure that you understand them well (along with my additional notes).  

Now that we’ve covered the tiers, let’s look at a case study. Mr. Bob is a millennial who may be a potential or recovering Disney Adult. A few years ago, he took my family and me on a trip to Disney World, one of the most overwhelmingly magical places on Earth. On the last day that we were there, in front of the big castle after the fireworks, Mr. Bob proposed to his now husband. According to the tier list, he should fall under the “:)” category. This also happens to be my favorite tier because the photo card for it is murderous Mickey (or Michael the Mouse, as my friends like to call him).  

I came up with a little hypothesis as to why the phenomenon that is Disney Adults occurs and then I contacted Mr. Bob for an interview to see if I could confirm what I thought. According to him, Disney had never been a part of his relationship with his husband. Mr. Bob grew up watching Disney movies, which set the standard of what romance should look like, a fairytale. While he claims that he isn’t the biggest Disney fan out there, he still associates his childhood heavily with Disney and it influences how he treats love in his adulthood. He also mentioned that growing up, he would see people propose to their significant others on Disney grounds, and he thought it was something grand and beautiful that he wanted to do, too. This kind of touches on what we’ve discussed in previous classes. Greater Disney influence. Generational Disney influence. Whether Mr. Bob counts as a Disney Adult is a question I’ll open to the floor.  

There could be many reasons as to why this phenomenon occurs when considering the individuality of every person. However, I guess that some of these Disney Adults love Disney because it links them, in some way, to their childhoods that they just can’t let go of. Wooo emotional stuntedness!  

  • Millennials were born in 1981-2000 
  • Disney Renaissance was from 1989-1999 

We know that the Disney Renaissance and millennials’ childhoods overlap. This leads me to believe that there was something in the upbringing of millennials that differed from any preceding generation. Parents began to use media and the internet as a substitute for supervision… like putting on child-friendly movies and leaving their kids unattended for hours in front of the movie screen. Chances are high that it was Disney that the millennials were watching (especially because Disney was popping out re-releases that were impossible to miss… *cough cough* generational Disney influence *cough cough*), so they developed a strong attachment to Disney movies in their childhoods. Now that they’re adults who probably want to relive their childhoods, we have Disney Adults.  

Will this horror ever end?! Or will it only grow (I sure hope not.). Remember how just a second ago we were talking about how parents let media substitute parental supervision? Well, that’s still a problem today (more now than it ever has been, honestly…). But the difference between now and then is that it’s not a movie screen that kids are placed in front of… it’s phones. There’s a new rise in hand-held, attention-eating technology and social media like TikTok and Instagram. I think Gen Alpha will have new problems to face. It seems we’re stepping away from Disney. I mean, my generation alone is already kind of detaching from it. 

With a drop of 33 percent of total viewers between 2018 and 2019 alone, it has been suggested that Disney Channel will continue to suffer in the years to come, and Disney Junior’s performance is equally poor.

Statista, Mar 24, 2023 

Disney is clearly on the decline. Kids are getting phones at younger ages and therefore aren’t watching Disney Channel much anymore. Children today no longer rely on Disney Channel for entertainment. Disney viewership ratings are dropping. Is Disney dying? I don’t know. Take from this mini rant what you will.  

For an even deeper understanding of Disney adults, check out Kurtis Conner’s video “A Deep Dive Into Disney Adults” :3 

Finally, I think a fun little final creative Disney-inspired project would be to create a short film telling the story of a would-be happy ending gone south. In this study, we focused on tier five—more specifically, Disney proposals. Couple that with previous discussions we’ve had in class concerning Disneyfication and how one of Disney’s signature themes is happy endings. Triple that with the attachment that Disney Adults have to Disney and their themes. If someone proposes at Disney but then gets rejected, would their idea of a happy ending be permanently altered? Would the illusions created by Disney vanish? What, exactly, happens? Disney has never had an unhappy ending. Tying everything together into a Disney proposal story turned villain-origin story would be incredible, I think. I’m already feeling the creative juices flow here.  

I sort of tied my questions into the write-up, but here:  

Is Mr. Bob a Disney Adult? Why or why not? 

Is Disney dying?